If it does not rollback, do i have to send a second command to roll it back? The code within the methods you call need to be transaction aware and enlist in the active transaction This means creating or using classes which are resource managers (see implement your own resource manager You do this by implementing ienlistmentnotification and enlisting in the transaction When the transaction is completed, the transaction manager will call methods as defined on that. In plain english, what are the disadvantages and advantages of using set transaction isolation level read uncommitted in a query for.net applications and reporting services applications?
Sometimes i get this kind of exception on not very busy sql server Transaction (process id 57) was deadlocked on lock resources with another process and has been chosen as the deadlock victim Could not commit jpa transaction Transaction marked as rollbackonly this exception occurs when you invoke nested methods/services also marked as @transactional. There is an update query in progress, the transaction is started at a higher level on the connection In order to ensure that all server data is in a valid state for the update, i need to do a couple reads.
It's noteworthy because there's a fair amount of complexity involved (especially in the communications) to assure that all the machines remain in agreement, so either the whole transaction. Turns out, i was running out of storage Write access was disabled when the. The alternative is an ambient transaction New in.net 2.0, the transactionscope object (system.transactions.dll) allows use over a range of operations (suitable providers will automatically enlist in the ambient transaction). Shouldn't begin transaction [tran1] be placed inside try
OPEN
